Brought to you through a partnership between the Healthcare Intelligence Network and The Pace Group...
BUY or BUILD - Is there an analysis which reflects the cost of developing a 'true' hospitalist program?
The Pace Group:
Hospitalist Programs: Make or Buy
The decision to make or buy a hospitalist program is largely dependent on the goal or goals that need to be achieved. Thus, it is more important to understand not how to do it, but what is the goal or problem to be solved. Being clear about the reason to start a hospitalist program will provide the groundwork for moving on to the critical decision point of making or buying the services.
Firstly, what is the goal of a hospitalist program? The answer will be clear if at least 50% of these statements are true or thought to be true:
- There is a shortage of PCP/specialist ER coverage
- The LOS is unsatisfactory
- The PCP does not respond, in a timely way, to hospital and ER requests to see patients
- The PCP needs relief from hospital care to increase productivity
- The member perception of ER care is negative
- The member perception of their care in the hospital is negative
- Patients with acute MI and other acute disorders not receiving timely care
- Member expresses dissatisfaction on availability of PCP, especially nights and weekends
- The PCP is unhappy over declining incomes and increased workloads, especially time spent in the hospital away from office
- Capitated PCP works fewer hours and does not want to work nights and weekends
- ER charges reflect excessive wait time in ER (many ER bills are based on hours spent in ER)
- There is widespread use of 911 by the members adding to increased ER volume
- Patients get readmitted multiple times without ever seeing PCP
- The PCP often refuses to take new patients
- There is a critical shortage of and contractual linkages to home care and SNF
- There is a lack of discharge planning in hospital at nights and weekends
Secondly, consider what can realistically be done to make a hospitalist program a viable service to the provider community and members? There are financial, political and quality of care issues that must be considered in the equation. For example, no referrals to the hospitalist equal failure before it starts. Find the catalyst that will persuade the physician community and the members that using a hospitalist program is a good thing. Will the ER physicians promote the program and refer the patients? Will the specialists promote the program if it means that the PCP will be available for pre-op exams? Will the PCP support the program if there is a relief from night and weekend coverage? Will the member push the program because of physician availability in the off-hours? Will the hospital support the program? Do the discharge planners for the hospital support the program?
Understanding the political, economic and satisfaction issues in the organization and community and then solidifying the base of support for the hospitalist program is a crucial step once the goals of the program have been determined.
At the point where the goals of the hospitalist program are clearly spelled out, the political and socio-economic factors driving the success of the program are understood and the likelihood of success is calculated, it is time to begin the crucial make vs. buy decision process.
Make vs. Buy Decisions
Make:
- You have enough talented and interested Internal Medicine physicians to do the job.
- Your PCPs agree to stay in their offices and not go to the hospitals.
- You have a leader who can educate, train and lead the hospitalists so as to reduce the LOS and admissions to the hospital.
- You can use the internal team to redirect admissions to many different hospitals or does the team want one location that is near and convenient to the office practice?
- You have a MIS system set up to allow efficient reporting and tracking of performance and information to the PCPs.
- You have an incentive program built in to get maximum improvement or is it business as usual?
- You have enough manpower to be able to flex for holidays and illness.
- You will hire full-time MDI to work in the program realizing some shared gains from the improved performance will pay their salary as well as what FFS will bring in. If no increased returns are forthcoming, then this is a very expensive program for the convenience factor of FPs and senior IMs, as their salary will go down to cover the cost.
Buy:
- The track record and reference check of the hospitalist program are good.
- The satisfaction surveys of both physicians and members is high.
- The hospital has a strong incentive to work with the hospitalist program to reduce LOS. Avoid relationships with hospitalist programs that have a financial linkage to the hospital that will encourage admissions and reduce the effectiveness of the program.
- You have the support of enough senior MDs to help defray the cost of the per diems in exchange for no more on-call.
Finally, just having a hospitalist does not make a good program. It needs to fill a need or solve a problem (real or perceived). Also, it needs a push from someone to reach critical mass and become self-sustaining.
Copyright 2000. The Pace Group Inc., 12160 Abrams Road, Suite 409, Dallas, TX 75243; (972) 437-5611; (800) 422-5611
Tell your friends about this web site!
Ask a Question
View the Previous Month's Question & Answer
Meet the Participating Consultants!
© Copyright 2012 Healthcare Intelligence Network
E-mail:info@hin.com
Call toll-free (888) 446-3530 |