Archive for the ‘Healthcare Quality Ratings’ Category

CMS Delays Enforcement of 5010 Standards

March 19th, 2012 by Cheryl Miller

CMS has postponed enforcement of its regulations requiring the use of the 5010 standards in all electronic healthcare transactions until June 30, 2012. It is two weeks before all healthcare providers and payors could have been penalized if they failed to comply and were not yet using the 5010 transaction set. Reaction to the news will be mixed, but there seems to be consensus that the delay is a welcome one.

In other CMS-related news, a new demonstration program to expand access to emergency psychiatric care for Medicaid beneficiaries could significantly cut state and hospital healthcare costs, reduce general acute care ED visits and help vulnerable patients get proper care. Federal law has prohibited Medicaid from paying for mental health services provided to Medicaid enrollees between the ages of 21 and 64. As a result, these patients have had to seek services in general hospital ERs, where they may not get the right care, or go to psychiatric hospitals where the care is appropriate but reimbursement is not provided, which has been a continued drain on healthcare resources.

Medicaid patients are the focus of another story, which details the barriers they face seeking treatment in primary care, making them twice as likely to visit the ED as their privately insured counterparts, according to a study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine. Even those Medicaid enrollees who have primary care report significant barriers to seeing their doctor, and given that many of them are in poor health, they tend to visit the ER more. Researchers hope their study will bring about change in this area.

Changes in the rates of hospital-acquired infections could be imminent, given a new study that found that hospitals with board-certified infection prevention and control directors have significantly lower rates of bloodstream infections (BSI) than those that are not led by a certified professional. It is the first such report to study the association between certified program directors and rates of healthcare-associated infections, researchers say.

And lastly, location plays an important role when it comes to healthcare quality, cost, accessibility and outcomes, says a new, extensive study from the Commonwealth Fund. But these factors vary greatly not only from one community to the next, but within and across states, depending on the performance of the healthcare system available to residents.

These stories and more in this week’s issue of Healthcare Business Weekly Update.

Q&A: With Hospital Core Measures, 90% Doesn’t Cut It

December 22nd, 2011 by Jessica Papay

Good core measure performance is good patient care, explains Dr. Steve Berkowitz, president at SMB Health Consulting and former chief medical officer for the central and west Texas division of HCA at St. David’s HealthCare. Prior to his presentation on Healthcare Performance Improvement: Exceeding Core Measure Targets for Value-Based Reimbursement, Dr. Berkowitz discussed the most challenging clinical measures to improve, tools for collecting core measure data and physician incentives to improve performance.

HIN: St. David’s healthcare system has specifically improved care related to heart attacks, heart failure, pneumonia and surgical care. What was the most challenging clinical measure among those to improve and what process changes sparked the improvement?

(Dr. Steve Berkowitz): Every one of those measures has unique challenges that we needed to handle. Frankly, a general challenge that we had was developing these protocols over eight hospitals in two different markets. Having said that, the most challenging measures are the surgical care improvement program (SCIP) measures because they are resource-intensive as well as require physician buy-in and input to make sure they get done appropriately. One thing I want the audience to come away with is a sense of enthusiasm that your organization can get it done. You can achieve virtual 100 percent performance with some hard work, checking and rechecking, and dedication of your physicians, nursing, pharmacy and administration. But most important, the establishment of good core measure performance is good patient care.

HIN: Can a hospital or health system that does not have an electronic health record share this type of data efficiently?

(Dr. Steve Berkowitz): Absolutely. When we first started this, we had very little of an electronic record at St. David, and that’s improving fast. What we were able to do was just develop internal processes to track those patients very early, have concurrent review of those patients, and get the data widely disseminated and available. Not only can we track our performance now, but we can use that data to identify outliers, whether they be physicians, nursing, pharmacists, etc., so that we can specifically target approaches to go for our goal of zero misses.

HIN: In the absence of the EHR, did you use registries at all to either collect the data or disseminate the data?

(Dr. Steve Berkowitz): We had some internal processes that we developed. But it really was a function of downloading all of the data from our system and then individually tracking and monitoring. I want to emphasize that to be excellent in core measures, it’s very labor intensive. You have to check, check and recheck, and there needs to be redundancies built into the system because we need zero misses. Ninety percent doesn’t cut it anymore, 95 percent doesn’t cut it anymore, and even 99.6 percent performance leaves a lot of dollars on the table.

HIN: What physician incentives were in place, or are in place, at St. David to encourage performance improvement?

(Dr. Steve Berkowitz): We have very little physician incentive there, although there is an incentive plan for the hospital lists because they are the driver of these measures, particularly with heart attacks, pneumonia and heart failure, and maybe less so with SCIP. But we instituted an incentive program for our hospital lists and they led the charge. They got us to outstanding performance quickly in those three categories.

November 4 Deadline Looms for Certain CMS Bundled Payment Models

November 2nd, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

Model 4 of the new CMS bundled payments program offers “the best balance of risk and reward” as well as opportunities for gainsharing, advises Jim Reilly, managing partner with TRG Health Care Solutions. This option appears to have the highest level of interest among providers Reilly has communicated with.

The four models included in the new CMS initiative are:

  • Model 1: Retrospective bundled payment for all inpatient hospital stays;
  • Model 2: Retrospective payment model for the acute inpatient hospital stays AND post-acute care;
  • Model 3: Retrospective payment model for post-acute care only;
  • Model 4: Prospective payment for select acute care hospital stay only – Providers select which MS-DRGs to include

Providers interested in participating in Models 2 through 4 have until Friday, November 4 to submit letters of intent to participate. Model 1’s deadline has already passed, Reilly noted, and interest in Model 2 is limited due to associated risk from post-acute care.

The veteran of previous CMS forays into bundled payments walked through the four models and timelines during last month’s webinar on “Evaluating CMS’ Bundled Payment Initiative: Operational, Financial and Clinical Considerations.”

Hospitals are more familiar with bundled payments than physician practices, who are traditionally paid by CMS on a fee for service basis, noted Reilly. CMS hopes the new bundled pricing initiative will incentivize hospitals and physicians to work more closely together to improve outcomes.

Reilly reported a “neutral to positive” assessment of CMS’s Acute Care Episode (ACE) pilot from the five participants in that recent CMS bundled payments trial. Reilly worked with all five health systems on the ACE project, including Baptist Health System. Model 4 is also most like the ACE model, and offers a prospective payment, in that CMS will pay one fee after the care is delivered.

Reilly posed several questions for providers to consider before committing to participate, including whether bundled payments will effectively align physicians, result in financial gain, improve quality benchmarks and inspire innovation and change in the healthcare industry.

His advice to potential participants? Start educating your physicians on the payment process, and start now: the application is extremely labor-intensive.

More MGMA Highlights: Changing Where and How Healthcare Is Delivered

October 27th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

The only way to revamp the existing healthcare system is to “change the places and the ways in which we deliver care,” advised Eric Dishman, Intel Fellow and director of health innovation and policy, during Tuesday’s opening session of the MGMA 2011 annual conference.

To illustrate, Dishman held aloft a small computer about the size of a pedometer that Intel gave to homebound elderly to wear. The computer generated data on their gait, information the scientific community can use to better understand how to prevent falls in this population, he explained during “Changing Practices: Home- and Community-Based Care Technologies for Independent Living.”

It’s just one of the ways Intel is studying the entire “human” system to better design the technologies to support their care, Dishman said.

Out in the conference exhibit hall, home monitoring technology by Alere supports the shift in care delivery locations that Dishman is proposing. The technology allows patients who take the anticoagulant Warfarin to test PT/INR levels regularly. Keeping PT/INR levels within a safe range can help individuals to avoid serious complications such as bleeding or stroke.

“These rapid and real-time diagnostic tests in home allow for more frequent testing, which provides additional data,” explained Clint Brown, Alere home monitoring national business director. “We can catch an INR drifting out of range, which is the essence of preventive care.”

By helping to reduce risk and adverse events, the technology helps to reduce the likelihood of readmissions, Brown added, “while contributing to the efficiency conversation.”

Patient portals were also part of the efficiency conversation at the conference, since they help to optimize EHR use, enhance patient engagement and clinical information exchange and shift some care management tasks to the patients themselves — everything from making appointments to paying bills to reviewing lab results. Most EHRs have a portal component that can be activated.

The conference’s Healthcare Innovations Pavilion featured a case study Tuesday on patient portal use, co-presented by Intuit and St. Vincent Medical Group. The 34-site, 150-physician multispecialty group launched the portal in May, explained Patti Ballman, St. Vincent’s director of operations, but is already experiencing improved patient flow, a decrease in telephone calls and an ability to see more patients.

The portal, which the medical group has branded “MySV,” positions the group well for the patient engagement requirement of meaningful use, but that wasn’t the primary driver for portal implementation, noted Ballman.

“We wanted to improve the care experience for the patients in the office. The online portal allows us to focus more on the patients who are in front of us rather than the ones on the phone.”

Physician practices considering the use of a patient portal should start collecting patients’ e-mails now to make the launch easier, Ballman recommended.

Portals are just one of the technologies that are helping physician practices to improve collections by providing a more private transaction. Another is automated voice messaging, contributes Marc Tumminello, vice president of healthcare practice sales for Televox, another exhibitor at the conference.

“Using automated reminders for accounts receivable is far less costly than call centers,” noted Tumminello. “Practices can also build in the option to speak to a live person. Giving the patients various payment options reduces the potential embarrassment of this transaction.”

Phreesia, which calls itself “The Patient Check-in Company,” puts this transaction back in the waiting room by building payment options into the self check-in process. Patients can check themselves in on the company’s bright orange portable tablets, then render their co-pay or outstanding balance by swiping their credit card on the side of the tablet. The technology verifies eligibility, and also offers customized disease management education at the end of each transaction.

Patients have been receptive to this technology, notes Phreesia representative Katie Ray, who was demonstrating the tablet. “Patients are used to self-service in other aspects of their lives; why not in healthcare?”

On the clinical side, several presenters described how they are embedding case managers in the primary care practice. In separate sessions, both Advocate Physician Partners (APP) and Marshfield Clinic said they have embedded case managers in physician practices in the last year.

Sixty colocated outpatient case managers were added to APP’s clinical integration program in early 2011, explained Dr. Mark Shields, senior medical director and vice president of medical management for Advocate Physician Partners and Advocate Health Care. “They will focus on the sickest 2 to 3 percent of our population.”

Marshfield Clinic has embedded 55 nurse care coordinators in its 35 NCQA-recognized level III patient-centered medical homes, explained Dr. Theodore Praxel, medical director of quality improvement and care management. On average, the nurse care coordinators have been working for about six months in the practices, which have been very positive about this addition to the care team.

Watch this blog for more detail on these hot topics for practices — as well some innovative strategies for coping with HIPAA compliance, physician shortages, acquisition, decreased reimbursements and other challenges.

ACO Final Rule Accompanied by Advance Payments for Care Coordination Tools

October 24th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

The anxiously awaited final rule on accountable care organizations (ACOs) for Medicare beneficiaries is finally out. Based on the more than 1300 comments CMS received on its proposed ACO ruling first released in March, this new rule will make it easier to establish ACOs by providing organizations with additional funding for support tools, such as new staff or information technology systems. Under this new initiative, the Advanced Payment Model, these payments would be recovered from any future shared savings.

The second initiative, the Medicare Shared Savings Program, will provide incentives for healthcare providers who agree to work together and become accountable for coordinating care for patients. Participants who meet certain quality standards based upon, among other measures, patient outcomes and care coordination among the provider team, may share in savings they achieve for the Medicare program. Both initiatives launched on October 20th.

The United States earned low marks in healthcare access and affordability in the Commonwealth Fund’s third annual scorecard report. According to the report, the nation received a 64 out of a possible 100 when compared to best performers. Among the findings that contributed to the score were the percentage of overweight or obese children (32 percent), the number of prescription errors among elderly Medicare beneficiaries (one out of four) and the percentage of adults that reported not having a primary care provider in 2008 (44 percent).

Despite the low scores in key quality indicators, the United States is doing something right in the area of heart failure (HF) care. New research from the Yale School of Medicine shows that hospitalization rates for HF dropped by 30 percent from 1998 to 2008. One year mortality rates also dropped slightly during this period. HF ranks as the most frequent cause of hospitalization and re-hospitalization among older Americans, with related costs estimated at $39.2 billion in 2010.

In other news, 46 percent of physician practices do not meet NCQA standards for medical homes. The news, from a recent University of Michigan-led study, found that while larger, multi-specialty practice groups can more easily meet the standards, one in nine Americans receive healthcare from smaller, often solo practices. Researchers recommend initiatives to help these smaller practices team up with larger organizations to establish more medical homes.

More than 50 percent of physicians and hospitals are looking at ways to team up, a trend that is causing medical malpractice concerns. Aon’s 12th annual Hospital and Physician Professional Liability Benchmark Analysis states that healthcare systems will face significant risk management challenges associated with integrated physician-hospital arrangements. The study details the growth of integrated self-insurance strategies and highlights the challenges faced by systems as they pursue the cost of risk savings.

And lastly, what are you doing to staunch the flow and expense of avoidable emergency department use? Describe your efforts in this area by October 31 and you will receive a free executive summary of results from this second annual survey. These stories and more in this week’s issue of Healthcare Business Weekly Update.

Caring Communication Can Boost Patient Satisfaction Quotient

October 13th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

“Do what you do so well that they will want to see it again and bring their friends.” Jack Welch’s words on customer satisfaction may not strictly apply to healthcare; after all, the former chairman and CEO of General Electric wouldn’t wish a hospital stay on anyone, no matter how elevated the quality of care.

However, in a value-driven environment, high marks in patient satisfaction are expected and rewarded, both by prospective patients seeking care at reputable facilities and by payors formulating reimbursement strategies.

To make the grade in patient satisfaction, healthcare organizations must clear the communication channels between providers and patients, say respondents to the 2011 Healthcare Intelligence Network survey on Improving Patient Satisfaction and the Healthcare Consumer Experience. That means everything from beefing up call management to increasing the number of touches while a patient is waiting for a doctor.

“Patient satisfaction might sound like a soft outcome, but patients get very dissatisfied when they are lying in an ED for long periods of time,” notes Toni Cesta, Lutheran Medical Center senior vice president of operational efficiency and capacity management.

“The most dissatisfying thing for patients in EDs is the time from triage until they are seen by a physician. That is the typical time in which the patient will walk out of the ED — if they have been triaged, put in a room and are waiting for a long period of time to be seen by the physician. If you can reduce that time from triage to seen by the physician in concert with ED leadership, that can help reduce the number of patients who walk out without being evaluated by a physician.”

So important is patient satisfaction that it has become a benchmark in its own right — to measure the success of healthcare initiatives from case management to accountable care organizations (ACOs). Beginning in April 2012, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) will award extra credit to patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) that submit CAHPS results twice a year.

Organizations preparing to join or transition to an ACO should immediately assess their patient satisfaction quotient, suggests Greg Mertz, senior project director with the Healthcare Strategy Group.

“One of the [ACO] obligations that is going to be placed on at least primary care providers is patient education, so if they haven’t spent a whole lot of time on patient compliance, or on patient satisfaction, that’s [going to be] a real learning curve issue for them…The government has said that it’s up to the physician to tell the patient that they are in an ACO. They’re going to have to convince [the patient] on no other basis than it makes good sense for your health, that you should really work with us to better manage your care.

“And since part of the evaluation of ACO shared savings is going to be based on patient input and patient satisfaction scores, [PCPs] are going to have to do it so that the patient accepts the value and is willing to give them good grades. A lot of physician behaviors are going to have to change; not that many have formal patient feedback loops at this point. It’s a different culture.”

(Excerpted from 2011 Benchmarks in Patient Satisfaction Strategies: Improving the Healthcare Consumer Experience.)

New Transitions of Care Credential Program for Case Managers

September 14th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

A timely new certification in care transitions recognizes skills and expertise in patient handoffs between sites of care.

The Case Management Society of America (CMSA) and the American Board of Quality Assurance and Utilization Review Physicians, Inc. (ABQAURP) are collaborating to create a sub-specialty certification for transitions of care (TOC.) According to the CMSA web site, this new credential is

“the first one to support professionals not only as a team, but also individually, who demonstrate competence and skills in providing the key elements of transitions of care.”

Successful transitions of care from one managed care environment to another are key to reducing hospital readmissions and improving overall healthcare costs and patient satisfaction. According to market research compiled in Healthcare Intelligence Network’s second annual Managing Care Transitions Across Sites survey conducted in May 2010, the hospital-to-home transition is the most critical transition in care, followed by skilled nursing facility (SNF)-to-home (49.2 percent) and ER-to-home transitions (45.9).

But until now, care transitions haven’t traditionally been part of medical education and training; according to the American Geriatrics Society:

  • Nearly 20% of Medicare patients readmitted to hospital within a month
  • Patients are frequently confused and dissatisfied by the discharge process
  • Communication between hospitalists and PCPs is equent
  • And patients are suffering: from those recently hospitalized who are often discharged without proper instructions on what medications to take or resume taking to faulty or incomplete handoffs of patients between provider shifts in teaching hospitals that may be responsible for more medical errors than overworked, sleep-deprived medical residents.

    The majority of HIN’s survey respondents said that post-transition patient contact, such as home follow-up visits and post-discharge telephone calls, were the most successful strategies to improve care transitions.

    And more than half of the respondents said that the case manager was most frequently charged with care transition management.

    Says Jan Van der Mei, continuum case management director at Sutter Health Sacramento Sierra Region:

    “One of the main focuses for care coordination is to avoid duplication of services when patients move from one site of care to the next. When someone is leaving the hospital, care coordination can help the patient get a follow-up appointment. When you are monitoring the patient, it may be helping them get to the office instead of going to the ED.

    “It is also many rounds of addressing the psychosocial issues and making sure that patients can actually make it to their appointments – that they have transportation and that when they get a new prescription, they are able to pick up the prescription and pay for it,” Van der Mei continues.

    Other elements for care coordination involve making sure when a PCP refers a patient to a specialist, that the specialist has the necessary information so they can provide the assessment that is being sought without actually duplicating tests that have already been done, recommends Van der Mei.

    Says Mary Beth Newman, MSN, RN-BC, CMAC, CCP, CCM, as quoted on the CMSA web site:

    “…we have worked hard to design the credential to help identify best practices, as well as to assist case managers in making recommendations that balance the appropriateness of health care services with cost and quality as related to transitions. It is vital that the program address the need for effectiveness, efficiency, equity, safety, and timeliness in transitions of care.”

    Four Transitions for Back-To-School

    September 12th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

    It’s back to school time, and the healthcare industry is undergoing its fair share of transitions.

  • NCQA is launching a new accreditation program for ACOs this fall. The organization worked with consumer advocates, purchasers and other healthcare and managed care experts to develop seven standards by which it will evaluate ACOs. Early bird adopters of the accreditation effort can get reduced rates on survey fees, online education tools and promotion. Order the NCQA ACO standards.
  • The one-year report card on Cigna’s ACO approach with Medical Clinic of North Texas (MCNT) is in; and both healthcare systems are reporting excellent grades in four key areas: reducing avoidable emergency room visits, following evidence-based medicine, lowering medical costs and better controlling diabetes. Since the accountable care program began, MCNT has received the highest level of recognition from NCQA for meeting national quality standards for physician group medical homes. Cigna helped by sharing patient-specific data that identifies individuals who could benefit most from additional outreach and follow-up care.
  • Medical students, rather than teachers, are getting apples this year: Apple iPads. Many universities, including Yale Medical School, profiled here, are downloading curriculum onto the tablets in an effort to be more “green,” save money, and protect patient confidentiality. Computer security has been a particular concern for the Yale School of Medicine, and the iPad is compliant with security and privacy laws and does not carry the same risk of information loss that a laptop might, Yale officials say.
  • And finally, a lesson that can’t be taught enough: smoking just a few cigarettes can kill. A new report from the CDC shows that smokers are smoking less: the percent of daily smokers who smoke nine or fewer cigarettes per day rose to nearly 22 percent in 2010, up from an estimated 16 percent in 2005. But smokers need not be heavy or long-term smokers to be affected with a smoking-related disease, or suffer a heart attack or asthma attack, CDC officials say. And states with the toughest anti-smoking campaigns, like like Maine, New York and Washington, have the fewest smokers. Which just goes to show that even the most resistant students can be taught to change their ways.
  • Headlines Show How Registries Boost Care Accountability for High Risk and Special Needs Patients

    September 7th, 2011 by Patricia Donovan

    Recent headlines illustrate the use of patient registries to enhance care of high-risk and special needs patients:

    First, medpage Today reports that a first look at a massive international registry of treatment for atrial fibrillation indicates that a high percentage of individuals are not being prescribed anticoagulation treatment that can reduce their risk of stroke. Researchers shared this data at the European Society of Cardiology meeting.

    Of the nearly 10,000 patients in the initial cohort of the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the Field (GARFIELD), CHADS2 scoring showed 55 percent of them to be eligible for anticoagulation therapy, but 33 percent of them didn’t get it, Ajay Kakkar, MD, of University College London, reported at the meeting.

    The Bayer-sponsored registry was designed to describe the real-life patterns of treatment in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation patients with at least one additional risk factor for stroke.

    And in last month’s lead-up to Hurricane Irene, Rhode Islanders with special healthcare needs were urged to enroll in an emergency special needs registry. In particular, the registry sought individuals using home oxygen, a respirator, ventilator, dialysis, pacemaker, or who are insulin dependent; those with mobility issues and using a wheelchair, walker, or cane; those that are visually impaired, blind, hard of hearing or deaf; those developmental or mental health disabilities; or those using assistive animals or a prosthesis.

    Almost half of respondents to a HIN August 2011 survey say they use some type of registry to collect health data related to their patients or plan members.

    The most popular reason for using a registry is to measure quality and performance on key health outcomes, said 105 healthcare organizations who answered 25 multiple choice and open-ended questions on patient registries. Download an executive summary of the survey results.

    85 percent of survey respondents believe that a registry will one day be a requirement for either Medicaid or Medicare reimbursement. Registries are already mandated for organizations seeking NCQA medical home recognition.

    “NCQA and patient-centered medical home actually requires that you develop registries,” noted Dr. Gregory Spencer during a recent presentation on “Patient Registries: A Cornerstone in Creating and Delivering Accountable Care.”

    “A registry is another name for a list of patients who meet a certain criteria, usually for a high risk or an important condition,” continued Dr. Spencer, chief medical officer with Crystal Run Healthcare. “Other real tangible benefits of registry use are in quality efforts, specifically in identifying groups of patients who need certain tests performed.”

    Geisinger, Dartmouth-Hitchcock in CMS PGP Transition Demo

    August 15th, 2011 by Cheryl Miller

    Congratulations to all CMS PGP Demonstration participants, especially Geisinger Health Systems and Dartmouth-Hitchcock, both of whom have shared their strategies for population health management with HIN.

    Early on in the PGP demo, DH targeted patients with CHF, CAD, and diabetes; it then developed two ‘super registries‘ to monitor both chronic disease markers and preventive care needs in its population. It created training for new roles for nurses and case managers, focusing on health coaching, motivational interviewing and bridging care across transitions. DH then created reports comparing its MDs’ performance with those of their peers. In the end, they received about $13 million in shared savings from CMS.

    Says Barbara Walters, senior medical director, “What did we do to make a difference? It was our admission rate, cost of care for CHF patients and our clinical quality compared to the comparison group. We didn’t even realize it but we had created a medical home, which is a very important cornerstone for all of this.”

    And Geisinger achieved 100 percent on the PGP program’s quality measures, the only one of the 10 organizations to do so for the last four years of the demonstration. “By focusing on improving quality, we were able to reduce the total costs of treating Medicare beneficiaries. Our costs at Geisinger rose only 1.4 percent, compared to the typical 4 to 6 percent increase observed nationwide,” said Thomas Graf, M.D., associate chief medical officer, Population Health; chairman, community practice, Geisinger Health System.

    We look forward to charting the progress of all of the organizations involved in the transitional program.

    You can read more about this and other healthcare issues in this week’s Healthcare Business Weekly Update.